Issue #4253
closedmodules.yaml reference in repomd.xml does not use selected checksum
Description
A report from upstream katello (https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/25529) indicates that pulp generates a repomd.xml file that claims to use the checksum type that has been set on the publisher, but in fact is not using that:
In this example it purports to have used a sha1 checksum, but in fact its actually a sha256 checksum:
<data type="modules">
<location href="repodata/824ffe238f202a0612ecbb2b0c0459dc289a7ef47adb1f26406453d41f476449-modules.yaml.gz"/>
<timestamp>1542811864</timestamp>
<size>33</size>
<checksum type="sha1">824ffe238f202a0612ecbb2b0c0459dc289a7ef47adb1f26406453d41f476449</checksum>
<open-size>0</open-size>
<open-checksum type="sha1">da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</open-checksum>
</data>
To reproduce:
1. create and sync a yum repository
2. set a checksum type of sha1
3. publish the repository
Related issues
Updated by ttereshc about 6 years ago
The checksum type is set correctly.
During publish of module.yaml repodata, sha256 checksum is always calculated. The correct checksum type can be found this way.
Updated by CodeHeeler about 6 years ago
- Triaged changed from No to Yes
- Sprint set to Sprint 46
- Tags Easy Fix added
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
- Assignee set to dalley
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
Added by dalley almost 6 years ago
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
- Platform Release set to 2.18.1
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
Applied in changeset a6a8e5dee38bb817e8f0dd9858e0117016f26fc2.
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
- Has duplicate Issue #4335: DNF can't handle empty modules.yaml.gz added
Added by dalley almost 6 years ago
Revision 7835e11b | View on GitHub
Fix bugs related to modularity
Ensure we don't publish module metadata files for repositories where the source repo had none.
Use the correct mechanism for determining the checksum used in the name of the modules.yaml.gz metadata file.
Additionally, refactor the module publish step to be more similar to the others.
closes #4252 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4252 closes #4253 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4253
Updated by bherring almost 6 years ago
- Copied to Test #4351: modules.yaml reference in repomd.xml does not use selected checksum added
Updated by dalley almost 6 years ago
Applied in changeset 7835e11b4710ed426f2471759c70e227c1128495.
Updated by jortel@redhat.com almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from MODIFIED to 5
Updated by jortel@redhat.com almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from 5 to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Fix bugs related to modularity
Ensure we don't publish module metadata files for repositories where the source repo had none.
Use the correct mechanism for determining the checksum used in the name of the modules.yaml.gz metadata file.
Additionally, refactor the module publish step to be more similar to the others.
closes #4252 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4252 closes #4253 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4253