Actions
Issue #9030
closed
As a user I want consistent naming between the remote options retained_versions and retain_package_versions
Start date:
Due date:
Estimated time:
Severity:
1. Low
Version:
Platform Release:
OS:
Triaged:
Yes
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Sprint:
Sprint 101
Quarter:
Description
See this community discussion: https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/36
Note that while retain_package_versions currently comes from RPM only, retained_versions comes from pulpcore.
The state of the discussion is that renaming retained_versions to retain_repo_versions would be the most meaningful and consistent. Of course this does mean renaming a API option which can break existing scripts? I don't know to what extent it is possible/desirable to retain aliases for backwards compatibility in such cases.
Related issues
Actions
.
Rename retained_versions field for consistency
fixes #9030