Pulp

08/06/2020

• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  12:35 PM · Commented on issue

  Needs Discussion: Should manually created Releases and Components also generate the relevant artifacts for verbatim publication? Story #7287: As a user I want to create arbitrary structured publications

  Right now the only way to create structured publications is to sync a remote repository (the metadata structure of which will be recreated by pulp_deb).
  Instead, I want the ability to:
  1. manually create a release from a list of one ...
• 
  quba42 Right now the only way to create structured publications is to sync a remote repository (the metadata structure of which will be recreated by pulp_deb).
  Instead, I want the ability to:
  1. manually create a release from a list of one ...

  12:27 PM · Created issue

08/05/2020

• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  04:17 PM · Committed changeset

  Change required status of package fields. Revision 8ece2464: Merge pull request #196 from ATIX-AG/package_fields_default
• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  04:16 PM · Created issue

  Issue #7279 (NEW): Add a test that uploads a "minimal" Debian package.

  By minimal Debian package I mean one that has ONLY required fields in the control file.
  That way we can ensure we are not dependent on any fields that are not required.
  Another possibility would be to add broken packages, that lack a...

08/04/2020

• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  09:37 AM · Commented on issue

  The Debian policy manual includes a clear list of what is and isn't required: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html Issue #7236: Sync fails if packages do not have a 'section' field

  The following remote can be used to reproduce this:
  ~~~ text
  http post :/pulp/api/v3/remotes/deb/apt/ name=mongo_debian_remote distributions="buster/mongodb-org/4.4" url="http://repo.mongodb.org/apt/debian/"
  ~~~
  The traceback:
  ~...
• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  09:30 AM · Committed changeset

  Add missing fields in Package file Revision 3063e93f: Merge pull request #193 from ATIX-AG/fix_translation_dict
• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  09:28 AM · Committed changeset

  Modify data type of fields in content model Revision e1fefe6f: Merge pull request #195 from ATIX-AG/fix_package_fields_type
• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  09:04 AM · Commented on issue

  Note: This issue essentially adds test coverage for the fixes for https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7190.
  It serves as a follow on issue, so these essential fixes can be merged without waiting for test coverage for now. Issue #7266: Add tests to ensure all control file fields present in an upstream package index will be present in pulp_deb

  We should have test packages/assertions etc. to ensure that each control file field present in an upstream repo makes it into our published repos.
  Should be ensured for both simple and structured publish.
  Note that "Description-md5...
• 
  quba42 We should have test packages/assertions etc. to ensure that each control file field present in an upstream repo makes it into our published repos.
  Should be ensured for both simple and structured publish.
  Note that "Description-md5...

  09:02 AM · Created issue
• 
  quba42 Debian Support

  08:52 AM · Commented on issue

  @swisscom We had the same issue, and fixed it under a separate issue: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7257
  I expect both fixes will be merged into master today.
  However, there is one more related/similar issue (https://pulp.plan.io/iss... Issue #7190: Pulp 3 - pulp-deb : APT client installing same patches again and again (field Multi-Arch)

  Dear support,
  We have the same issue than reported in https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6982 but for field Multi-Arch (was fixed for field Installed-Size in https://github.com/pulp/pulp_deb/pull/184)
  Would it be possible to fix missing M...