Issue #9030: As a user I want consistent naming between the remote options retained_versions and retain_package_versions - Pulp

Actions

Send by e-mail Copy link

Issue #9030

closed

As a user I want consistent naming between the remote options retained_versions and retain_package_versions

Added by quba42 over 3 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:

CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Category:

Sprint/Milestone:

3.15.0

Start date:

Due date:

Estimated time:

Severity:

1. Low

Version:

Platform Release:

OS:

Triaged:

Yes

Groomed:

Sprint Candidate:

Tags:

Sprint:

Sprint 101

Quarter:

Description

See this community discussion: https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/36

Note that while retain_package_versions currently comes from RPM only, retained_versions comes from pulpcore.

The state of the discussion is that renaming retained_versions to retain_repo_versions would be the most meaningful and consistent. Of course this does mean renaming a API option which can break existing scripts? I don't know to what extent it is possible/desirable to retain aliases for backwards compatibility in such cases.

Related issues

Actions

Copy link

Updated by quba42 over 3 years ago

Related to Story #9031: As a user, retain_package_versions remote option uses 0 vs. Null in an intuitive way, consistent with other Pulp configuration options added

Actions

Copy link