Issue #5994
closed
Name clash with the SELinux policy for Pulp2
Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Description
This repo is called pulp-selinux, but it really contains the policy for Pulp3 aka pulpcore, so I personally would have expected it to be called pulpcore-selinux.
Additionally, there is a pulp-selinux RPM package, built from the pulp2 source, so we'll have to rename this during packaging anyways as otherwise we end up with two packages with the same name.
Adding P2 label to identify the work priority w.r.t. Katello.
- Triaged changed from No to Yes
- Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
- Assignee set to bmbouter
@evgeni I've renamed the pulp-selinux to pulpcore-selinux and notified pulp-dev here
Besides renaming the repository, was there more to do? Does the policy name conflict with pulp2 and we need to do something about that also?
I would prefer if the files would also be called pulpcore.fc etc, not pulp.fc etc, but that's not strictly a requirement as the files in the old pulp2 policy are called pulp-COMPONENT.fc etc.
On January 21, 2020 6:54:05 PM UTC, Pulp <notifications@plan.io> wrote:
But to your question, for consistency, I'd also rename the policy itself, yeah.
On January 21, 2020 6:54:05 PM UTC, Pulp <notifications@plan.io> wrote:
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
I guess it's more clear for the users if that's also called pulpcore_port.
On January 22, 2020 9:01:31 PM UTC, Pulp <notifications@plan.io> wrote:
- Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
- Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
The last PR got completed, so now all the names use pulpcore. I'm moving to CLOSED. Please let me know what else can be improved.
- Tags Katello added
- Tags deleted (
Katello-P2)
Also available in: Atom
PDF
.
Renames policy from 'pulp' to 'pulpcore'
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5994 re #5994