Story #2788
closed
As a user i can configure removal of old published repodata
Added by rmcgover over 7 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.
0%
Description
When a yum repo is published, and sqlite generation is enabled (generate_sqlite=true), and incremental publish is activated (i.e. force_full is not true and units were not deleted since last publish), new sqlite files will be created and old sqlite files will be retained.
Since the old sqlite files are never cleaned, this means that the published repodata of a repo will keep all old sqlite files since the last non-incremental publish, which wastes space and makes publishes slower.
Steps to reproduce:
- Create repo, ensure it has a yum_distributor with generate_sqlite: true
- Add RPM to repo
- Publish repo
- Note count of *-primary.sqlite.bz2 files in published repo
- Add RPM to repo
- Publish repo
- Note count of *-primary.sqlite.bz2 files in published repo
Actual result:
- After first publish, 1 primary sqlite file exists
- After second publish, 2 primary sqlite files exist
Expected result:
- After first publish, 1 primary sqlite file exists
- After second publish:
- If https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1684 is implemented, sqlite files should be subject to the configured retention options. Thus it depends on the age of the existing sqlite file.
- Otherwise, to be consistent with XML handling, the old sqlite files should probably be deleted, so only 1 primary sqlite file exists.
Files
| fedora-26-pulp-2-15-beta.txt (8.62 KB) fedora-26-pulp-2-15-beta.txt | Ichimonji10, 12/12/2017 11:26 PM |
Related issues
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com over 7 years ago
The publishes that will get slower, were meant to be done with rsync distributor.
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com over 7 years ago
i had a chat with jluza, we believe that If we fix this issue https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2783, the current one will not have slowdown in the rsync publish, because the file would have preserved the mitime and would not get rsynced
Updated by rmcgover over 7 years ago
Both yum and rsync publishes will become slower due to this (though rsync is worse affected).
For example, we had a repo with a repodata directory containing about 28GB worth of sqlite files and that's enough to noticeably slow down the "copy files" step in yum publishes.
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com over 7 years ago
- Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
- Assignee set to jluza
Updated by jluza over 7 years ago
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
Added by jluza over 7 years ago
Updated by jluza over 7 years ago
- Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
Applied in changeset 7457f4ab3fae861ac590ad584b64d655d8c91074.
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com over 7 years ago
- Tracker changed from Issue to Story
- Subject changed from sqlite files are retained indefinitely to As a user i can configure removal of old published repodata
- % Done set to 0
Added by ttereshc over 7 years ago
Revision 15bf5854 | View on GitHub
Fix release notes for 2.14 and 2.15 releases
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
- Status changed from 5 to ASSIGNED
Tested against Fedora 25 and Fedora 26 with Pulp 2.15 beta 2 installed. Here's the relevant packages on F25:
[root@fedora-25-pulp-2-15-beta ~]# rpm -qa | grep pulp | sort
pulp-admin-client-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-deb-admin-extensions-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-deb-plugins-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-docker-admin-extensions-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-docker-plugins-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-ostree-admin-extensions-1.3.0-1.fc25.noarch
pulp-ostree-plugins-1.3.0-1.fc25.noarch
pulp-puppet-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-puppet-plugins-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-puppet-tools-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-python-admin-extensions-2.0.2-1.fc25.noarch
pulp-python-plugins-2.0.2-1.fc25.noarch
pulp-rpm-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-rpm-plugins-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-selinux-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
pulp-server-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-kombu-3.0.33-8.pulp.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-bindings-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-client-lib-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-deb-common-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-docker-common-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-oid_validation-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-ostree-common-1.3.0-1.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-puppet-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-python-common-2.0.2-1.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-repoauth-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-rpm-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
python-pulp-streamer-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc25.noarch
And F26:
[root@fedora-26-pulp-2-15-beta ~]# rpm -qa | grep pulp | sort
pulp-admin-client-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-deb-admin-extensions-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-deb-plugins-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-docker-admin-extensions-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-docker-plugins-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-ostree-admin-extensions-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-ostree-plugins-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-plugins-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-tools-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-python-admin-extensions-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-python-plugins-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-rpm-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-rpm-plugins-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-selinux-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-server-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-bindings-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-client-lib-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-deb-common-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-docker-common-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-oid_validation-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-ostree-common-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-puppet-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-python-common-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-repoauth-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-rpm-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-streamer-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
Here's the test script:
#!/usr/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
readonly rpms=(
'https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-unsigned/bear-4.1-1.noarch.rpm'
'https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-unsigned/camel-0.1-1.noarch.rpm'
'https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-unsigned/cat-1.0-1.noarch.rpm'
)
counts=()
pulp-admin login -u admin -p admin
pulp-admin rpm repo create --repo-id foo --generate-sqlite true
for rpm in "${rpms[@]}"; do
wget "$rpm"
pulp-admin rpm repo uploads rpm --repo-id foo --file "$(basename "$rpm")"
pulp-admin rpm repo publish run --repo-id foo
find /var/lib/pulp/published/yum/master -type f -name '*-primary.sqlite.bz2'
counts+=("$(find /var/lib/pulp/published/yum/master -type f -name '*-primary.sqlite.bz2' | wc --lines)")
done
pulp-admin rpm repo delete --repo-id foo
echo "${counts[*]}"
Here's the final output on F25:
1 2 3
And on F26:
1 2 3
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com almost 7 years ago
@jeremy did you configure and notice the new options for the distributor? https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1056/files#diff-7cb9179c56cd2d7232d3e801a56ffceaR631
You did not mention any of those in your testing.
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
No, I didn't use any of those new options. I ran the script listed in my previous comment. I'll re-test.
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
I performed testing in the way that I did because of what the issue states:
Expected result:
After first publish, 1 primary sqlite file exists. After second publish:
- If https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1684 is implemented, sqlite files should be subject to the configured retention options. Thus it depends on the age of the existing sqlite file.
- Otherwise, to be consistent with XML handling, the old sqlite files should probably be deleted, so only 1 primary sqlite file exists.
Is it fair to say that Pulp 2.15 doesn't act according to this description? If so, that's OK. I just want to have that explicit confirmation.
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
Fail, again. When one attempts to configure a distributor with the remove_old_repodata or remove_old_repodata_threshold options, an error is returned. Peeking in the logs shows errors like:
pulp.plugins.pulp_rpm.plugins.distributors.yum.configuration:ERROR: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata] is not supported
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) Exception adding distributor to repo [06acfbc4-96b4-4e6a-a418-32bed2f55bf4]; the repo will be deleted
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) Traceback (most recent call last):
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pulp/server/controllers/repository.py", line 433, in create_repo
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) dist_controller.add_distributor(repo_id, type_id, plugin_config, auto_publish, dist_id)
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pulp/server/controllers/distributor.py", line 77, in add_distributor
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) raise exceptions.PulpDataException(message)
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2257-64544) PulpDataException: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata] is not supported
pulp.server.webservices.middleware.exception:INFO: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata] is not supported
and:
pulp.plugins.pulp_rpm.plugins.distributors.yum.configuration:ERROR: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata_threshold] is not supported
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) Exception adding distributor to repo [9d542ad1-7ca6-4a90-9906-7ee23a775932]; the repo will be deleted
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) Traceback (most recent call last):
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pulp/server/controllers/repository.py", line 433, in create_repo
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) dist_controller.add_distributor(repo_id, type_id, plugin_config, auto_publish, dist_id)
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pulp/server/controllers/distributor.py", line 77, in add_distributor
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) raise exceptions.PulpDataException(message)
pulp.server.controllers.repository:ERROR: (2256-33152) PulpDataException: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata_threshold] is not supported
pulp.server.webservices.middleware.exception:INFO: Configuration key [remove_old_repodata_threshold] is not supported
Have a look at Pulp Smash 826, and let me know if something is wrong with the test case.
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com almost 7 years ago
new distributor parameters where not added to the validation config https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/blob/master/plugins/pulp_rpm/plugins/distributors/yum/configuration.py#L58
Updated by pcreech almost 7 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
WIth the failing of verification, this issue is being considered a blocker for 2.15.0 until further notice
Added by werwty almost 7 years ago
Revision d1fc3eee | View on GitHub
Add remote_old_repodata and remove_old_repodata_threshold to optional config.
Added by werwty almost 7 years ago
Revision 5ac5f94f | View on GitHub
Add remote_old_repodata and remove_old_repodata_threshold to optional config.
re #2788 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2788
(cherry picked from commit d1fc3eeea10792e1bff8c4d3b84751f5a8c13e8f)
Updated by Ichimonji10 almost 7 years ago
This issue has been fixed in 2.15 beta 3. See:
Here's a sample of the RPMs installed when doing testing:
[root@fedora-26-pulp-2-15-beta ~]# rpm -qa | grep pulp | sort
pulp-admin-client-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-deb-admin-extensions-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-deb-plugins-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-docker-admin-extensions-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-docker-plugins-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-ostree-admin-extensions-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-ostree-plugins-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-plugins-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-puppet-tools-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-python-admin-extensions-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-python-plugins-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
pulp-rpm-admin-extensions-2.15.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-rpm-plugins-2.15.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-selinux-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
pulp-server-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-bindings-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-client-lib-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-deb-common-1.6.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-docker-common-3.1.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-oid_validation-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-ostree-common-1.3.0-1.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-puppet-common-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-python-common-2.0.2-1.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-repoauth-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-rpm-common-2.15.0-0.3.beta.fc26.noarch
python-pulp-streamer-2.15.0-0.2.beta.fc26.noarch
Notice that the RPM-related RPMs have had their version numbers bumped.
Updated by pcreech almost 7 years ago
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com over 6 years ago
- Related to Issue #3551: RemoveOldRepodataStep for yum publisher not checking repomd.xml to remove old files added
Updated by mihai.ibanescu@gmail.com about 5 years ago
- Related to Issue #5573: Publish won't create multiple checkecksummed copies of primary.xml, fileliststs.xml etc even when in fast-forward mode added
.
RemoveOldRepodataStep for yum publisher
New publish step removes repodata older than threshold which is by default 14 days.
closes #2788 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2788