Project

Profile

Help

Refactor #98

closed

Move repo auth functionality for certs/entitlement from plugin(s) into the platform.

Added by jortel@redhat.com over 7 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Platform Release:
2.7.0
Groomed:
Sprint Candidate:
Tags:
Pulp 2
Sprint:
January 2015
Quarter:

Description

Move the functionality used to provide authenticated repository access by certificate and entitlement from the plugins into the platfrom.


Related issues

Has duplicate Pulp - Refactor #9: As a developer, I would like /etc/pulp/repo_auth.conf to be owned by platformCLOSED - DUPLICATEcduryee

Actions
Blocks OSTree Support - Story #99: As a user, I want to protect ostree repositories using a certificate and entitlements.CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASEjortel@redhat.com

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 7 years ago

This may be an extension of #9.

Actions #2

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • Sprint/Milestone set to 9
Actions #3

Updated by rbarlow over 7 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Task to Refactor
Actions #4

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
  • Assignee set to cduryee
  • Platform Release set to master
Actions #5

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

Randy,

Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, do you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).

Actions #6

Updated by rbarlow over 7 years ago

On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Chris Duryee wrote:

Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, do
you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's
additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way
around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).

I think this is fine for a Y release. Nobody should be depending on
pulp_rpm having this code specifically, so as long as the features and
API of pulp_rpm + platform remains the same (which I believe it will),
this is perfectly acceptable for a Y.

On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Pulp wrote:

Actions #7

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 20 to 60
Actions #8

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
  • % Done changed from 60 to 100
Actions #9

Updated by cduryee over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
Actions #10

Updated by rbarlow over 7 years ago

  • Platform Release changed from master to 2.7.0
Actions #11

Updated by dkliban@redhat.com over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from MODIFIED to 5
Actions #12

Updated by rbarlow over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from 5 to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Actions #13

Updated by bmbouter over 4 years ago

  • Sprint set to January 2015
Actions #14

Updated by bmbouter over 4 years ago

  • Sprint/Milestone deleted (9)
Actions #15

Updated by bmbouter over 3 years ago

  • Tags Pulp 2 added

Also available in: Atom PDF