Project

Profile

Help

Send by e-mail

Refactor #98

Move repo auth functionality for certs/entitlement from plugin(s) into the platform.

Added by jortel@redhat.com about 6 years ago. Updated almost 2 years ago.

Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Priority:
High
Assignee:
cduryee
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Platform Release:
2.7.0
Groomed:
Sprint Candidate:
Tags:
Pulp 2
Sprint:
January 2015
Quarter:

Description

Move the functionality used to provide authenticated repository access by certificate and entitlement from the plugins into the platfrom.

Related issues

Has duplicate Pulp - Refactor #9: As a developer, I would like /etc/pulp/repo_auth.conf to be owned by platformCLOSED - DUPLICATE

<a title="Actions" class="icon-only icon-actions js-contextmenu" href="#">Actions</a>
Blocks OSTree Support - Story #99: As a user, I want to protect ostree repositories using a certificate and entitlements.CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

<a title="Actions" class="icon-only icon-actions js-contextmenu" href="#">Actions</a>

History

#1 Updated by jortel@redhat.com about 6 years ago

This may be an extension of #9.

#2 Updated by cduryee about 6 years ago

  • Sprint/Milestone set to 9

#3 Updated by rbarlow about 6 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Task to Refactor

#4 Updated by cduryee about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
  • Assignee set to cduryee
  • Platform Release set to master

#5 Updated by cduryee almost 6 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

Randy,

Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, do you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).

#6 Updated by rbarlow almost 6 years ago

On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Chris Duryee wrote:

Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, do
you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's
additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way
around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).

I think this is fine for a Y release. Nobody should be depending on
pulp_rpm having this code specifically, so as long as the features and
API of pulp_rpm + platform remains the same (which I believe it will),
this is perfectly acceptable for a Y.

On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Pulp wrote:

#7 Updated by cduryee almost 6 years ago

  • % Done changed from 20 to 60

#8 Updated by cduryee almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
  • % Done changed from 60 to 100

#9 Updated by cduryee almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from POST to MODIFIED

#10 Updated by rbarlow almost 6 years ago

  • Platform Release changed from master to 2.7.0

#11 Updated by dkliban@redhat.com over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from MODIFIED to 5

#12 Updated by rbarlow almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from 5 to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

#13 Updated by bmbouter almost 3 years ago

  • Sprint set to January 2015

#14 Updated by bmbouter almost 3 years ago

  • Sprint/Milestone deleted (9)

#15 Updated by bmbouter almost 2 years ago

  • Tags Pulp 2 added

Please register to edit this issue

Send by e-mail

Also available in: Atom PDF