|
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:26:52 +0100
|
|
From: rbarlow@redhat.com
|
|
To: dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io
|
|
Message-ID: <54bd4c6c4a5c1_6e4f3f8d4bf33e9c43a3@apollo.mail>
|
|
in-reply-to: redmine.journal-247.20150119154320@plan.io
|
|
Subject: Re: [Pulp - Refactor #98] Move repo auth functionality for
|
|
certs/entitlement from plugin(s) into the platform.
|
|
Mime-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
|
|
boundary=JlrSf9uDxVvJSTHdWL8cnbKiedOlRkJ8q;
|
|
charset=UTF-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Level: -----
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Score: -5.0
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-5.0 points) pts rule name
|
|
description ---- ----------------------
|
|
-------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL:
|
|
Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [209.132.183.28 listed in
|
|
list.dnswl.org]
|
|
X-HE-SPF: PASSED
|
|
|
|
|
|
--JlrSf9uDxVvJSTHdWL8cnbKiedOlRkJ8q
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain;
|
|
charset=utf-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
|
|
|
|
On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Chris Duryee wrote:
|
|
> Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, d=
|
|
o
|
|
> you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's
|
|
> additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way=
|
|
|
|
> around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).
|
|
|
|
I think this is fine for a Y release. Nobody should be depending on
|
|
pulp_rpm having this code specifically, so as long as the features and
|
|
API of pulp_rpm + platform remains the same (which I believe it will),
|
|
this is perfectly acceptable for a Y.
|
|
|
|
On 01/19/2015 10:43 AM, Pulp wrote:
|
|
> --- Please write your response above this line ---
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Issue #98 has been updated by Chris Duryee.
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> * *% Done* changed from /0/ to /20/
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Randy,
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Based on our prior convo from awhile back re: modules and versioning, d=
|
|
o
|
|
> you agree this is ok for a Y release? I think it's OK since it's
|
|
> additive to platform. IMO it would maybe be 3.0 if it was the other way=
|
|
|
|
> around (moving functionality from platform to plugin).
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
|
|
-
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Refactor #98: Move repo auth functionality for certs/entitlement from=
|
|
|
|
> plugin(s) into the platform. <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/98#change-2=
|
|
47>
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> * Author: Jeff Ortel
|
|
> * Status: ASSIGNED
|
|
> * Priority: High
|
|
> * Assignee: Chris Duryee
|
|
> * Category:
|
|
> * Sprint/Milestone: January 2015
|
|
> * Target Release: master
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Move the functionality used to provide authenticated repository access
|
|
> by certificate and entitlement from the plugins into the platfrom.
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
|
|
-
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> You have received this notification because you have either subscribed
|
|
> to or are involved in a project on pulp Planio.
|
|
> To change your notification preferences, please click here:
|
|
> https://pulp.plan.io/my/account
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> This notification was cheerfully delivered by <https://plan.io/>
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
> Planio <https://plan.io/>
|
|
> =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--JlrSf9uDxVvJSTHdWL8cnbKiedOlRkJ8q--
|
.