Project

Profile

Help

Task #5638

closed

ansible-pulp on EL7 should use postgres 10 SCL rather than 9.6 SCL

Added by mdepaulo@redhat.com over 4 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:
CLOSED - WONTFIX
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Installer - Moved to GitHub issues
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
(Total: 0:00 h)
Platform Release:
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
Yes
Tags:
CI/CD
Sprint:
Quarter:

Description

ansible-pulp, when run against RHEL7/CentOS 7, currently enables and uses the SCL for Postgres 9.6

It should use the SCL for Postgres 10 instead.

In addition to the benefits to Pulp itself of a newer database, the benefits are:
1. EOL on May 2021 rather than Oct 2020.
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl
2. Katello (currently integrating Pulp 3) wants to use Postgres 10 as well. (They are currenlty using an older 9.x). And they do not want 2 database instances running for 2 different versions of postgres.

The downsides to us doing this (which might be mitigated) are:
1. If we want to keep Postgres 9.6 support for a while, ansible-pulp's molecule CI would have to test it. molecule theoretically override the vars though for a new test config, but adding another test config for the 3 containers molecule phase (and thus 4 containers) would slow down CI a little (or a lot if low on RAM.)


Sub-issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Task #5639: pulp-operator should use postgres 10 rather than 9.6CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by fao89 over 4 years ago

  • Tags CI/CD added
Actions #2

Updated by bmbouter almost 4 years ago

  • Category set to Installer - Moved to GitHub issues
  • Tags deleted (Pulp 3 installer)
Actions #3

Updated by dkliban@redhat.com over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from NEW to CLOSED - WONTFIX

We don't plan on working on this any time soon.

Also available in: Atom PDF