Project

Profile

Help

Send by e-mail

Story #3970

Story #3968: As a Pulp user, I can protect content I have stored in Pulp

As a user, I can configure a Distribution to be protected by one ContentGuard

Added by daviddavis almost 3 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
jortel@redhat.com
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
3.0.0
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Platform Release:
Groomed:
Yes
Sprint Candidate:
Yes
Tags:
Sprint:
Sprint 45
Quarter:

Description

Distributions will have a foreign key to ContentGuards. A ContentGuard could belong to many Distributions. Also, a ContentGuard is not required for a Distribution meaning that a user doesn't have to enable content protection for their distribution.

Related issues

Related to Pulp - Test #4256: As a user, the content guard logic needs to be loaded and used by the content app.CLOSED - COMPLETE<a title="Actions" class="icon-only icon-actions js-contextmenu" href="#">Actions</a>
Blocked by Pulp - Story #3969: As a user, I can CRUD a ContentGuardCLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

<a title="Actions" class="icon-only icon-actions js-contextmenu" href="#">Actions</a>

Associated revisions

Revision 154eea25 View on GitHub
Added by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

Add content-guard to Distribution. closes #3970

Revision 154eea25 View on GitHub
Added by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

Add content-guard to Distribution. closes #3970

Revision 40621ef5 View on GitHub
Added by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

Delegate content authorization to optional content-guard. closes #3970

History

#1 Updated by daviddavis almost 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by jortel@redhat.com almost 3 years ago

  • Blocked by Story #3969: As a user, I can CRUD a ContentGuard added

#3 Updated by jortel@redhat.com almost 3 years ago

Let's define the cardinality and specific changes to the data model. Will Distributions be associated with more than one ContentGuard (many-to-many)? Or, simply one-to-many?

#4 Updated by daviddavis almost 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#5 Updated by jortel@redhat.com almost 3 years ago

  • Groomed changed from No to Yes
  • Sprint Candidate changed from No to Yes

#6 Updated by amacdona@redhat.com almost 3 years ago

  • Sprint set to Sprint 43

#7 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
  • Assignee set to jortel@redhat.com

#8 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST

#9 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

#10 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from MODIFIED to ASSIGNED

#11 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST

#12 Updated by ttereshc over 2 years ago

  • Sprint changed from Sprint 43 to Sprint 45

#13 Updated by jortel@redhat.com over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from POST to MODIFIED

#14 Updated by bherring over 2 years ago

  • Related to Test #4256: As a user, the content guard logic needs to be loaded and used by the content app. added

#15 Updated by daviddavis about 2 years ago

  • Sprint/Milestone set to 3.0.0

#16 Updated by bmbouter about 2 years ago

  • Tags deleted (Pulp 3)

#17 Updated by bmbouter over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

Please register to edit this issue

Send by e-mail

Also available in: Atom PDF