Project

Profile

Help

Issue #2503

closed

remove_missing does not seem to remove on_demand catalog entries

Added by jsherril@redhat.com over 7 years ago. Updated almost 4 years ago.

Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Priority:
High
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
Estimated time:
Severity:
3. High
Version:
2.9.3
Platform Release:
2.12.1
OS:
Triaged:
Yes
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Pulp 2
Sprint:
Sprint 14
Quarter:

Description

working with a katello user, it seems that if you've configured a yum repo to use on_demand and remove_missing, the catalog entry isn't getting removed and even though that rpm was removed from the upstream repo, pulp will still try to download it from that repo. In this case it was removed from one repo but added to 2nd repo, but pulp was trying to still pull it from the 1st one.

This is compounded by the fact that it seems that pulp uses the oldest cataloge entry rather than the newest (this might need to be another issue).

Also available in: Atom PDF