Issue #8944
closed
Cannot sync RHEL6 repos from cdn.redhat.com
Description
- a containerized pulp based on pulp-ci-centos image with:
pulpcore-3.13.0 pulp-rpm-3.13.0
I am not sure whether it's a Pulp bug or a CDN data error, but RHEL6 i386 and x86_64 repo syncing repeatedly fails with this error. The repositories are synced with mirror=True and the distribution is set to point to repository (so that the latest repo is always distributed).
Repo: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server from RHUI (RPMs) (6Server-i386)
Start Time: 2021-06-21 22:24:04
Finish Time: 2021-06-21 22:28:18
Elapsed Time: 0:04:13.581718
Result: Error
Exception: Package id from primary metadata (42003b3621ebf25f9b5fe25b0d2c4f2024958a9d), does not match package id from filelists, other metadata (dcacfd1c930cba9ee112c1055e7a1e94bedd7f3a)
Traceback: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rq/worker.py", line 1013, in perform_job
rv job.perform()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rq/job.py", line 709, in perform
self._result = self._execute()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rq/job.py", line 732, in _execute
result = self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File "/src/pulp-rpm/pulp_rpm/app/tasks/synchronizing.py", line 395, in synchronize
version = dv.create()
File "/src/pulpcore/pulpcore/plugin/stages/declarative_version.py", line 149, in create
loop.run_until_complete(pipeline)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 484, in run_until_complete
return future.result()
File "/src/pulpcore/pulpcore/plugin/stages/api.py", line 225, in create_pipeline
await asyncio.gather(*futures)
File "/src/pulpcore/pulpcore/plugin/stages/api.py", line 43, in __call__
await self.run()
File "/src/pulp-rpm/pulp_rpm/app/tasks/synchronizing.py", line 674, in run
await self.parse_repository_metadata(repomd, repomd_files, file_extension)
File "/src/pulp-rpm/pulp_rpm/app/tasks/synchronizing.py", line 719, in parse_repository_metadata
file_extension=file_extension,
File "/src/pulp-rpm/pulp_rpm/app/tasks/synchronizing.py", line 987, in parse_packages
).format(pkgid, pkgid_extra)
Files
Related issues
Updated by ipanova@redhat.com almost 3 years ago
dalley seems like the concern of the package order is a problem
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
- Assignee set to dalley
- Triaged changed from No to Yes
- Sprint set to Sprint 99
T
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
This is pretty strange. It seems like there are a bunch of packages listed multiple times in the XML with the same pkgids.
Here's a list of the order in which Pulp processed the package IDs. On the left is the primary pkgid and on the right is the filelists + other pkgid
The same package (6d14ff6cdf996a8e01916f5ba9dbfe9634e062ce) is also listed a second time in primary.xml, but in a different place.
It's also not the only package with multiple entries. The one listed right above (83739344533b27a6e6467323b9b6486fbc34f409) also has multiple entries. So does (e3da2f9a5dda3f1c0f133df5a092fedd78560137).
For all of these these the actual metadata is the same between the two entries, including the location_href. I can't think of any rational reason for that. And especially not for some of the entries to be in different orders. You would think that even if the same pkgid is present multiple times, the packages would still be in the same order?
Weird. If this is something that can "sometimes happen" then perhaps we need to have some fallback behavior, but I think we should also bring this up to EXD.
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
I think the problem is not "out of order packages". Since primary.xml is parsed into a dict keyed by pkgid, it automatically throws away duplicates. So then when we iterate the dictionary in-order, the 2nd instance of the package is ignored, but that isn't the case with the iterative parser. So the disjoint parsing methods is the cause of the out of ordering problem, which is caused by duplicate package entries in the repo.
As a workaround we could keep a list of pkgids "seen" by the iterative parser and try to skip over them. I've also started a discussion with EXD about it.
Added by dalley almost 3 years ago
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to MODIFIED
Applied in changeset 8393a60695dd28a38d515cd7376396734626ae16.
Added by dalley almost 3 years ago
Revision 7f4c0dbb | View on GitHub
Handle duplicate packages in upstream repos
Some repositories have some packages listed in the metadata twice. This shouldn't happen (but it does). createrepo_c deduplicates by virtue of parsing everything into a dict keyed by pkgid, but the iterative parser does not. This eventually results in a mismatch once the iterative parser comes across a package that the createrepo_c primary parser already handled. So we keep a list of pkgid's we've already written out in order to skip them once the iterative parser hits them a 2nd (or 3rd, etc.) time.
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
- Related to Backport #8962: Backport 8944 to 3.13.1 added
Updated by dalley almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
.
Handle duplicate packages in upstream repos
Some repositories have some packages listed in the metadata twice. This shouldn't happen (but it does). createrepo_c deduplicates by virtue of parsing everything into a dict keyed by pkgid, but the iterative parser does not. This eventually results in a mismatch once the iterative parser comes across a package that the createrepo_c primary parser already handled. So we keep a list of pkgid's we've already written out in order to skip them once the iterative parser hits them a 2nd (or 3rd, etc.) time.
closes: #8944 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8944