Task #5786
closedRemove "missing workers" from Status API
100%
Description
Problem¶
Environments that have random worker names chosen each time a worker starts, e.g. k8s/openshift, will accumulate a "missing worker" each time a worker starts. This part of the API made sense when the workers always used the same names.
Solution¶
Remove the "missing workers" from the Task API
Updated by daviddavis about 5 years ago
- Tracker changed from Issue to Task
- % Done set to 0
- Groomed changed from No to Yes
- Sprint set to Sprint 62
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
- Status changed from NEW to ASSIGNED
- Assignee set to bmbouter
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
Also should we?
online_worker -> workers
online_content_apps -> content_apps
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
daviddavis wrote:
That sounds fine to me.
I made the change and decided to revert it. Having online_ does make it really clear these are the "online" workers.
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
- Status changed from ASSIGNED to POST
PR available at: https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/413
Added by bmbouter about 5 years ago
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
- Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset pulpcore|bf8794ac47f34d0cb487b66ffc41bde496fad761.
Added by bmbouter about 5 years ago
Revision c0fcdb7c | View on GitHub
Remove "missing_workers" from Status API
Having "missing_workers" did not work well when worker names are unique each time. It accumulated an endless number of worker names.
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5786 closes #5786
(cherry picked from commit bf8794ac47f34d0cb487b66ffc41bde496fad761)
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
- Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Remove "missing_workers" from Status API
Having "missing_workers" did not work well when worker names are unique each time. It accumulated an endless number of worker names.
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5786 closes #5786