Project

Profile

Help

Send by e-mail

Task #5563

Label things as tech-preview

Added by bmbouter 3 months ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:
CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
daviddavis
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
3.0.0
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Platform Release:
Blocks Release:
Backwards Incompatible:
No
Groomed:
Yes
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Documentation
QA Contact:
Complexity:
Smash Test:
Verified:
No
Verification Required:
No
Sprint:

Description

There are a few areas of Pulp3 that are merged, but may have changes made to it in the future. The docs need to clearly indicate these at the top of those documentation sections.

Items

Associated revisions

Revision 187bdfde View on GitHub
Added by daviddavis about 1 month ago

Label things as tech preview

ref #5563

Revision 19ee3858 View on GitHub
Added by daviddavis about 1 month ago

Label file system exporter as a tech preview

ref #5563

Revision 330309ad View on GitHub
Added by daviddavis about 1 month ago

Label file system exporter as a tech preview

ref #5563

(cherry picked from commit 19ee3858cc2f11b722e9966d7bb202bedbd5b91d)

Required PR: https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/450

Revision 4baeedb0 View on GitHub
Added by daviddavis about 1 month ago

Label things as tech preview

ref #5563

(cherry picked from commit 187bdfdedead6a79cc017d6de015c2f74f5ce970)

Required PR: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_file/pull/332

History

#1 Updated by bmbouter 3 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by daviddavis 3 months ago

  • Groomed changed from No to Yes

#3 Updated by daviddavis 3 months ago

What about adding the Exporter code as well?

#4 Updated by bmbouter 3 months ago

daviddavis wrote:

What about adding the Exporter code as well?

I personally don't think we need to label them because they are so straightforward, but you feel we should I'm ok w/ that.

#5 Updated by daviddavis 3 months ago

  • Tracker changed from Issue to Task
  • % Done set to 0

#6 Updated by bmbouter 3 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#7 Updated by bmbouter about 2 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#8 Updated by daviddavis about 2 months ago

Some of these things aren't in our docs. What if we have a tech preview list in our 3.0 announcement?

#9 Updated by bmbouter about 2 months ago

daviddavis wrote:

Some of these things aren't in our docs. What if we have a tech preview list in our 3.0 announcement?

We probably should include this in the 3.0 announcement either way. I started that doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WC_ooHYuYlNGbGg9WOBW3Qbq9E7YAx1Bv1F2ZODOMFk/edit

We should add a section to the changelog also maybe?

What about adding labels to the docstrings so they show up in the swagger API docs?

#10 Updated by daviddavis about 1 month ago

We should add a section to the changelog also maybe?

That sounds good.

What about adding labels to the docstrings so they show up in the swagger API docs?

If there's an easy way to do this (and it's easy to rollback once we release 3.1) then that sounds fine to me. I don't think there is though?

#11 Updated by daviddavis about 1 month ago

Actually, Exporters are the only thing here that show up in the REST API. We could label those as tech preview in the docstring/swagger API I think.

#12 Updated by bmbouter about 1 month ago

daviddavis wrote:

Actually, Exporters are the only thing here that show up in the REST API. We could label those as tech preview in the docstring/swagger API I think.

+1

#14 Updated by bmbouter about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from NEW to POST
  • Assignee set to daviddavis

Final PR available as part of changelog for 3.0.0: https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/453

#15 Updated by bmbouter about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from POST to MODIFIED

These PRs have been merged.

#16 Updated by bmbouter about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE

Please register to edit this issue

Send by e-mail

Also available in: Atom PDF