Project

Profile

Help

Actions
Send by e-mail Copy link

Issue #4526

closed

Users are stored in the database with an integer id

Added by daviddavis about 5 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
CLOSED - WONTFIX
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
Estimated time:
Severity:
2. Medium
Version:
Platform Release:
OS:
Triaged:
Yes
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Sprint:
Quarter:

Description

When we switched back to using UUIDs instead of integer IDs, we didn't update the user model. This is because we no longer extend the base user model in Pulp.

Should we consider updating the user to use uuids to be consistent? We don't expose User to our users.

Related change:

https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3549/files#diff-976127cc8b10f9c00255cc0e5d248a0eL43

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by amacdona@redhat.com about 5 years ago

  • Triaged changed from No to Yes

This will need a migration, but consensus is that the migration will be ok post RC.

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by bmbouter almost 5 years ago

  • Tags deleted (Pulp 3)
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by dkliban@redhat.com over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from NEW to CLOSED - WONTFIX

We are using the Django user model and don't have control over this field.

Actions
Send by e-mail Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF