Refactor #3555
closedRemove "helper" viewset mixins
100%
Description
In app/viewsets/base.py, we currently have the following "helper" mixins:
class NamedModelViewSet(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
mixins.DestroyModelMixin,
mixins.UpdateModelMixin,
mixins.ListModelMixin,
GenericNamedModelViewSet):
"""
A viewset that provides default `create()`, `retrieve()`, `update()`, `partial_update()`,
`destroy()` and `list()` actions.
"""
pass
class CreateDestroyReadNamedModelViewSet(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
mixins.DestroyModelMixin,
mixins.ListModelMixin,
GenericNamedModelViewSet):
"""
A customized NamedModelViewSet for models that don't support updates.
A viewset that provides default `create()`, `retrieve()`, `destroy()` and `list()` actions.
"""
pass
class CreateReadNamedModelViewSet(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
mixins.ListModelMixin,
GenericNamedModelViewSet):
"""
A customized NamedModelViewSet for models that don't support updates or deletes.
A viewset that provides default `create()`, `retrieve()`, and `list()` actions.
"""
pass
class CreateReadAsyncUpdateDestroyNamedModelViewset(mixins.CreateModelMixin,
mixins.RetrieveModelMixin,
mixins.ListModelMixin,
AsyncUpdateMixin,
AsyncRemoveMixin,
GenericNamedModelViewSet):
"""
A viewset that performs asynchronous update and remove operations
This viewset should be used with resources that require making a reservation for a repository
during an update or delete.
"""
pass
I propose deleting all of them, and renaming the "GenericNamedModelViewSet" to "NamedModelViewSet" for brevity.
Rationale:
- The name "CreateReadAsyncUpdateDestroyNamedModelViewset" makes me want to burn my eyes out
- It's not scalable
- These helper mixins make it too easy to gloss over the individual actions being provided
I found a mistake [0] where the Worker model viewset inherited from CreateModelMixin, DeleteModelMixin, and UpdateModelMixin via the "NamedModelViewSet" helper. (This was prevented from being an actual bug by the fact that it manually specified the allowable HTTP method names).
Each and every viewset should enumerate all of its provided actions in a clear way. These helper mixins don't do that. Sure, it would make the viewset code a bit "uglier", but there's good ugly and there's bad ugly, and this is bad ugly IMO.
Updated by dalley over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from Remove "helper" queryset mixins to Remove "helper" viewset mixins
- Description updated (diff)
Added by dalley over 6 years ago
Updated by dalley over 6 years ago
- Status changed from POST to MODIFIED
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset pulp|bfe9040f1b5457762922396aa60bfd60ee41ea88.
Updated by bmbouter about 5 years ago
- Status changed from MODIFIED to CLOSED - CURRENTRELEASE
Remove 'helper' viewset mixins
closes #3555 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3555