Pulp

# Pulp 3.0.0 Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

## Authentication

I can login with a username and password that Pulp stores  

I can CRUD a user  

I can list all users  

I can change the password of a user  

I can acquire a token to access the API  

I can invalidate all JWT tokens for a given user

## Repositories

I can list all repos  

I can CRUD a repository  

I can list associated importers and publishers  

I can list content in a repository  

I can summarize content in a repo (including counts)  

I can CRUD an importer  

I can CRUD a publisher

## Content Manipulation

I can sync an importer  

I can publish a publisher  

I can upload *(What to where?)*  

I can copy *(What from where to where?)*  

I can clean up orphans

## Filter

I can filter all nouns *(What is the meaning of "filter?" What is a noun?)*

## Task Management

I can list all tasks and filter them  

I can see a detail view for a specific task including its progress and results  

I can cancel tasks

## Task Group

I can view a summary of the status of all tasks in a group

## Event Listener Notifier

I can receive serialized task info via AMQP on each task save

## Status

I can view the status of all pulp components  

I can view an overall health attribute  

I can view information about unapplied migrations

## Plugin API

We will have one  

We will use one  

It will be semantically versioned at 0.x separate from the REST API

*Will this API be a Python code interface, a networked HTTP interface, or something else? In other words, for Pulp to use a plugin, will Pulp look for Python code, will it make HTTP calls to some networked resource, or something else?*

*What are three examples of plugins that will be written? (One goal is "we will use one," so presumably some specific plug-ins are already in mind.)*

## CLI

We will port what is there with as little effort as possible *(Does this mean that porting will be easy for developers, or that switching from the Pulp 2-3 CLI will be easy for users? If the former, isn't this an implementation detail that doesn't belong in an MVP document? If the latter, does this mean that we're going to carry forward the issues with pulp-admin, like a lack of status codes?)*

repo CRUD  

CRUD for importers  

CRUD for publishers  

trigger syncs  

trigger publish  

list content in a repo  

upload  

server status  

list and cancel tasks  

authn via basic auth  

*(Should the supported set of operations be stated in terms of "The capabilities listed in the 'Authenctication,' 'Repositories,' and 'Filter' sections will be supported by the CLI."?)*

## Nectar Plugin Download API

*(Is it correct to say that "I, the user, can download files via HTTP, HTTPS and file://," or "Nectar, the application, can download files via HTTP, HTTPS and file://?")*  

I can download files via HTTP, HTTPS  

I can download via file://  

Authentication parity with 2.y *(Again, is this an "I can do X" statement or a "Nectar can do X" statement?)*  

Recommend something for bandwidth limiting  

Verify integrity of downloaded files  

Alternate content source support *(Please clarify what this means. Does this mean that content can be downloaded via a protocol other than HTTP, HTTPS and file://? Does it mean that a single importer may attempt to download content from a prioritized list of locations? Something else? Assuming this is an importer-related things, which types of importers will support this? RPM? Python? Etc?)*  

Streamer parity with 2.y

## Consumer Applicability

Using consumer profiles and repo bindings I can compute applicability with 2.y parity  

Performance needs to be awesome

## ISO exports

Export a group of repos to a single iso

## Plugin compatibility

rpm will work with platform  

puppet will work with platform  

ostree will work with platform  

python will work with platform  

file_plugin will work with platform  

docker will work with platform

## Migrations

users can run an executable similar to pulp-manage-db that is not named pulp-manage-db