Issue #6820
Updated by dalley about 4 years ago
Chat log discussion: ~~~ │14:17:04 jjeffers | I have an odd dep solving scenario, and I am not sure why this is happening │ │14:17:51 jjeffers | We are using https://jlsherrill.fedorapeople.org/fake-repos/needed-errata/ │ │14:18:26 jjeffers | If you specify a copy with both walrus packages (and dep solving is true), we don't │ │ | see any dependencies copied │ │14:18:58 jjeffers | If we specify one of the walrus packages (0.71), which has dependencies, only, then │ │ | the target repo gets the dependencies copiyed │ │14:19:19 jjeffers | If we specify the other walrus, then no dependencies are copied (which is expected). │ │14:19:48 jjeffers | I'm just not clear as to why when both packages are copied, no dependencies are │ │ | copied │ │14:30:58 * | dalley sees "dep solving", hides │ │14:31:05 jjeffers | I'm so sorry │ │14:31:10 dalley | lol │ │14:31:18 dalley | it's fine, reading ^ │ │14:31:26 jjeffers | I am hoping this is operator fault │ │14:31:46 jjeffers | But both iballou and I have seen this behavior │ │14:32:27 dalley | jjeffers, interesting. I believe you, I'll take a look at it │ │14:36:11 jjeffers | ok ty │ │14:36:21 jjeffers | we only noticed this by comparing pulp2 with pulp_rpm ~~~