Pulp

Issue #5304

Updated by dkliban@redhat.com over 4 years ago

The initial bug report has led to the identification of the following problems: 
 * pulp 3 cannot create PublishedMetadata files in /var/lib/pulp/published/ because POSIX permissions prevent it on a machine where Pulp 2 has already published content 
 * PublishedMetadata are the only files that are stored in /var/lib/pulp/published, everything else is stored in /var/lib/pulp/artifact 
 * Plugin API provides 2 ways to represent content: Content (made up of Artifacts) and PublishedMetadata 
 ** content app has two code paths for serving PublishedMetada and Content 
 ** metadata that is mirrored exactly as published is represented as a Content model and the same metadata generated by Pulp is represented as PublishedArtifcat 
 ** any code that exports a publication to a filesystem needs to have 2 code paths to export the contents of a publication 
 
 The solution to all these problems is to make PublishedMetadata inherit from Content. This way the artifact backing the PublishedMetadata would be stored in artifact storage. The plugin writer experience can be simplified by providing a constructor that allows the plugin writer to pass in a file, a relative path, Content and a publication. The creation of combine PublishedFile and PublishedArtifact into one object. For any generated metadata, plugins will create an Artifact, ContentArtifact, PublishedMetadata, and PublishedArtifact is handled by the constructor. The constructor also will save the PublishedMetada to the database.   

 Here is some example code from the during a publish task in the File plugin: 

 <pre><code class="python"> 
 with WorkingDirectory(): 
     with FilePublication.create(repo_version, pass_through=True) as publication: 
         manifest = Manifest(manifest) 
         manifest.write(populate(publication)) 
         metadata = PublishedMetadata( 
             relative_path=os.path.basename(manifest.relative_path), 
             publication=publication, 
             file=File(open(manifest.relative_path, "rb")), 
         ) 
         metadata.save() 
 </code> 
 </pre> 

 The plugin writer would do the following instead: 

 <pre><code class="python"> 
 with WorkingDirectory(): 
     with FilePublication.create(repo_version, pass_through=True) as publication: 
         manifest = Manifest(manifest) 
         manifest.write(populate(publication)) 
         metadata = PublishedMetadata( 
             file=manifest.relative_path, 
             relative_path=os.path.basename(manifest.relative_path), 
             publication=publication, 
         ) 
 </code> 
 </pre> 

 The orphan cleanup query needs to be updated to consider content that is part of a publication to not be considered orphaned. task.  

Back