|
Return-Path: <rbarlow@redhat.com>
|
|
Received: from mi025.mc1.hosteurope.de ([80.237.138.230]) by wp245.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Z0ZWC-0006za-3r; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:05:28 +0200
|
|
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by mx0.webpack.hosteurope.de (mi025.mc1.hosteurope.de) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1Z0ZWB-0002EZ-7I for dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:05:27 +0200
|
|
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A0ABBB46 for <dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:05:24 +0000
|
|
Received: from where.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-101.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.101]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t54I5NWo001442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:05:24 -0400
|
|
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:05:22 -0400
|
|
From: Randy Barlow <rbarlow@redhat.com>
|
|
To: Pulp <dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io>
|
|
Message-ID: <55709362.1080305@redhat.com>
|
|
In-Reply-To: <redmine.journal-4674.20150604150020.64c5e26434989312@plan.io>
|
|
References: <redmine.issue-20.20141218161236@plan.io>
|
|
<redmine.journal-4674.20150604150020.64c5e26434989312@plan.io>
|
|
Subject: Re: [RPM Support - Story #20] As a user, my applicability data is
|
|
calculated in parallel
|
|
Mime-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain;
|
|
charset=utf-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
|
|
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:05:28 +0200
|
|
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
|
|
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
|
|
Thunderbird/31.7.0
|
|
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Level: ----------
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Score: -10.0
|
|
X-HE-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points) pts rule name
|
|
description ---- ----------------------
|
|
-------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL:
|
|
Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [209.132.183.28 listed in
|
|
list.dnswl.org] -5.0 PGP_MESSAGE RAW: Contains a PGP signed or encrypted
|
|
message
|
|
X-HE-SPF: PASSED
|
|
Envelope-to: dropbox+pulp+c71e@plan.io
|
|
|
|
On 06/04/2015 11:00 AM, Pulp wrote:
|
|
> It might be worth thinking about whether we can make a patch that will
|
|
> apply cleanly against 2.4 since there are users who are having problems=
|
|
|
|
> with DB cursor timeouts. Patching against 2.6 might also be fine if we
|
|
> are comfortable requiring users to upgrade to a newer Pulp to fix this.=
|
|
|
|
|
|
On second thought, this might have to be done with "spawned tasks" which
|
|
would change the API to the task. One way to work around this not being
|
|
backwards-incompatible would be to add an optional boolean to the API
|
|
call that lets the user state whether they want to do the calculation in
|
|
parallel or not, and if the bool isn't provided we default to the
|
|
current behavior. Then, with Pulp 3.0 we can just change to always doing
|
|
it in parallel and drop the boolean.
|
|
|
|
-- =
|
|
|
|
Randy Barlow
|
.