Project

Profile

Help

Issue #7732

Provide nicer progress reporting messages

Added by jsherril@redhat.com about 1 month ago. Updated 26 days ago.

Status:
NEW
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
Estimated time:
Severity:
2. Medium
Platform Release:
OS:
Triaged:
Yes
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Katello
Sprint:
Quarter:

Description

Currently the progress reporting messages for yum content are not all that pretty:

Migrating importers to Pulp 3
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 RPM content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 RPM content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 SRPM content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 SRPM content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 DISTRIBUTION content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 DISTRIBUTION content (detail info)
Processing Pulp 2 repositories, importers, distributors
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 YUM_REPO_METADATA_FILE content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 ERRATUM content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 ERRATUM content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 MODULEMD content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 MODULEMD content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 YUM_REPO_METADATA_FILE content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_LANGPACKS content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 MODULEMD_DEFAULTS content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 MODULEMD_DEFAULTS content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_LANGPACKS content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_GROUP content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_GROUP content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_CATEGORY content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_CATEGORY content (detail info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_ENVIRONMENT content (general info)
Pre-migrating Pulp 2 PACKAGE_ENVIRONMENT content (detail info)
Creating repositories in Pulp 3
Migrating content to Pulp 3
Migrating rpm content to Pulp 3 rpm
Migrating rpm content to Pulp 3 srpm
Migrating rpm content to Pulp 3 distribution
Migrating rpm content to Pulp 3 erratum

Some quirks about them are:

  • content types are named like: 'PACKAGE_GROUP', i think just naming them 'package group' would be nicer
  • "Migrating rpm content to Pulp 3 srpm" is a tad confusing, something like "Migrating srpms to Pulp3 for the Rpm Plugin" would be better,

I've also noticed that the 'code' for each progress report isn't unique. Does it make sense to make them unique?

History

#1 Updated by ttereshc 26 days ago

  • Triaged changed from No to Yes

Please register to edit this issue

Also available in: Atom PDF