Issue #6990
Concepts page gives a wrong impression that repositories are not typed
Status:
NEW
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Sprint/Milestone:
-
Start date:
Due date:
Estimated time:
Severity:
2. Medium
Version:
Platform Release:
OS:
Triaged:
Yes
Groomed:
No
Sprint Candidate:
No
Tags:
Documentation
Sprint:
Quarter:
Description
User @thm pointed out that the concepts page doesn't make it clear that repositories are typed. Examples of different content types followed by adding content unit 1 and content unit 2 to a repo give an impression that one can combine different content types into one repo (e.g. rpm and ansible role).
It is also possible that this was intentional and the page hasn't been updated since repositories became typed.
Please register to edit this issue
.