Test #6348: Test that Pulp deals well with missing workers. - RPM Support - Pulp

Actions

Send by e-mail Copy link

Test #6348

closed

Test that Pulp deals well with missing workers.

Added by fao89 about 3 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:

CLOSED - DUPLICATE

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Sprint/Milestone:

Version:

Platform Release:

Tags:

Sprint:

Quarter:

Description

Ticket moved to GitHub: "pulp/pulp_rpm/2235":https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/issues/2235

1. Ensure there is only one Pulp worker.
2. Create a repository. Let its feed reference a large repository. (For example, EPEL.)
3. Start a sync. Immediately restart the ``pulp_workers`` service. (It's
   important that ``pulp_workers`` be restarted, not started and stopped.
   For details, see #2835 ) This should cause the first sync to abort.
4. Update the repository. Let its feed reference a small repository. (For
   example, ``https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-unsigned/``.)
5. Start a sync. Verify that it completes. If `Pulp #2835`_ still affects
   Pulp, then the worker will be broken, and the sync will never start.

Reference: #2835