https://pulp.plan.io/https://pulp.plan.io/favicon.ico2018-03-06T17:39:14ZPulpRPM Support - Issue #3435: Account for different datetime format in Suse erratahttps://pulp.plan.io/issues/3435?journal_id=250012018-03-06T17:39:14Zbizhangbizhang@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>I've talked to <a class="user active" href="https://pulp.plan.io/users/281">ttereshc</a> about this, issued date in pulp is just a string, so pulp store whatever is provided in the suse errata to the database. This is one errata item from SUSE in the pulp db after sync [0], note that issued date is present.</p>
<p>Issued date is also not used for comparison anywhere, so the different format should not be a problem.</p>
<p>Updated date on the other hand is used for comparison, but SUSE does not use the updated field, so that should not be an issue either.</p>
<p>[0] <a href="https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/xPVqjG3ze1VcZ7B4C8YREA" class="external">https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/xPVqjG3ze1VcZ7B4C8YREA</a></p> RPM Support - Issue #3435: Account for different datetime format in Suse erratahttps://pulp.plan.io/issues/3435?journal_id=265732018-03-09T15:40:23Zdalleydalley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>NEW</i> to <i>CLOSED - NOTABUG</i></li><li><strong>Triaged</strong> changed from <i>No</i> to <i>Yes</i></li></ul> RPM Support - Issue #3435: Account for different datetime format in Suse erratahttps://pulp.plan.io/issues/3435?journal_id=265882018-03-09T17:56:17Zttereshcttereshc@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>"issued" date is not blank in Pulp database. After some discussion with reporter, this date is likey not parsed correctly by Katello, so Katello issue will be filed.</p> RPM Support - Issue #3435: Account for different datetime format in Suse erratahttps://pulp.plan.io/issues/3435?journal_id=379832019-04-15T20:13:04Zbmbouterbmbouter@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Tags</strong> <i>Pulp 2</i> added</li></ul>